Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First DepartmentOct 29, 1998
254 A.D.2d 230 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
254 A.D.2d 230679 N.Y.S.2d 306

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • People v. Faulknor

    …As an alternative holding, we find that the plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. The record fails to…

  • People v. Trimm

    …We also note that defendant did not object to the imposition of the fine at the time of sentencing.…

lock 3 Citing caseskeyboard_arrow_right

October 29, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Sheindlin, J.).

Defendant's claim that the sentencing court's remarks concerning parole release constituted an enhanced sentence is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court's remarks were neither a directive to the Parole Board nor an enhancement of the promised sentence ( People v. Skinner, 232 A.D.2d 201, lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 929; People v. Saldana, 221 A.D.2d 239, 240, lv denied 87 N.Y.2d 1024).

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.