People
v.
Gleixner

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second DepartmentNov 10, 1986
124 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • People v. Cirina

    …An examination of these statutes indicates that all degrees of sexual abuse (see, People v Glover, 57 N.Y.2d…

  • People v. Cardona

    …15). Contrary to the defendant's claim, the People proved the element of forcible compulsion by overwhelming…

lock 2 Citing caseskeyboard_arrow_right

November 10, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Farlo, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

A review of the record indicates that there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict (see, People v Walstatter, 53 N.Y.2d 871; People v Gebert, 118 A.D.2d 799, 801; People v Griffith, 80 A.D.2d 590, 591).

In addition, we find that the trial court correctly refused to charge the jury concerning the crime of sexual abuse in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.55), as a lesser included offense of the counts charging sodomy in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.50, [2]; see, People v Wheeler, 67 N.Y.2d 960). Moreover, the trial court did not err in refusing to charge the crime of sexual misconduct (Penal Law § 130.20) as a lesser included offense of the counts charging sodomy in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.50, [2]; see, People v Aglio, 112 A.D.2d 440; cf. People v McEaddy, 30 N.Y.2d 519).

We have considered the defendant's other contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Lazer, J.P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.