People
v.
Deoleo

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.Jan 24, 2012
936 N.Y.S.2d 914 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
936 N.Y.S.2d 91491 A.D.3d 8842012 N.Y. Slip Op. 531

2012-01-24

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Vinicio DEOLEO, appellant.

Vinicio Deoleo, Beacon, N.Y., appellant pro se. Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Tammy J. Smiley and Margaret E. Mainusch of counsel), for respondent.


Vinicio Deoleo, Beacon, N.Y., appellant pro se. Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Tammy J. Smiley and Margaret E. Mainusch of counsel), for respondent.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 18, 2000 ( People v. Deoleo, 278 A.D.2d 426, 717 N.Y.S.2d 378), *915 affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered June 21, 1999.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883).

MASTRO, A.P.J., RIVERA, DILLON and FLORIO, JJ., concur.