From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. St. Maurice

Supreme Court of California,In Bank
Sep 24, 1913
166 Cal. 201 (Cal. 1913)

Summary

In People v. St. Maurice, 166 Cal. 201, 135 P. 952, where code provisions provided that if in a criminal action the judgment is a fine, with or without imprisonment, execution may issue thereon as on a judgment in a civil action and other code provisions declared such a judgment constitutes a lien in like manner as a judgment for money rendered in a civil action, the Supreme Court of California, in ruling on the question "What is the effect of the death of a defendant adjudged to pay a fine, when death occurs pending the appeal from such judgment?"

Summary of this case from State v. Stotter

Opinion

Crim. No. 1788.

September 24, 1913.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, from an order denying a motion in arrest of judgment, and from an order refusing a new trial. J.M. Hughes, Judge.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

A.M. Seymour, and Archibald Yell, for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Charles Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


Cherry de St. Maurice was indicted and convicted of the crime of contributing to the delinquency and dependency of a minor child by selling liquor to such minor child. The judgment of conviction was upheld upon her appeal to the court of appeals for the third district, and a hearing was granted by this court. The judgment of conviction ordered her to pay a fine in the sum of five hundred dollars, and, in default of the payment, to be imprisoned in the county jail of Sacramento County one day for each two dollars of the fine.

While her appeal was thus pending and awaiting decision before this court the defendant died a violent death. Suggestion of her death has been presented to this court, with the request that it make its appropriate order in the premises.

The Penal Code provides that if in a criminal action the judgment is a fine with or without imprisonment execution may be issued thereon as on a judgment in a civil action. (Pen. Code, sec. 1214.) And section 1206 of the same code declares that a judgment that a defendant pay a fine with or without the alternative of imprisonment, constitutes a lien in like manner as a judgment for money rendered in a civil action.

The question is, therefore, what is the effect of the death of a defendant adjudged to pay a fine, when death occurs pending the appeal from such judgment? There can be but one answer to the question, and that is that, in the absence of a statute expressing the contrary, all proceedings in the matter incurably abate. We need not amplify this plain proposition. It will be found fully supported by the following authorities, state and federal, a number of which present facts practically identical with those of the case at bar: United States v. Dunne, 173 Fed. 254, [19 Ann. Cas. 1145, 97 C.C.A. 420]; United States v. Pomeroy, 152 Fed. 279; United States v. Mitchell, 163 Fed. 1014; Town of Carrollton v. Rhomberg, 78 Mo. 547; Willis v. Byrne, Admr., 106 Ala. 425, [17 So. 332]; March v. State, 5 Tex. App. 450[ 5 Tex.Crim. 450]; Overland etc. Co. v. People, 32 Colo. 263, [105 Am. St. Rep. 74, 75 P. 924]; Boyd v. State, 3 Okla. Cr. 684, [108 P. 432].

It is therefore adjudged that all proceedings in the above entitled cause, and especially under the judgment therein rendered, have permanently abated, and that the superior court of Sacramento County enter its appropriate order to that effect.

Lorigan, J., Sloss, J., Angellotti, J., Melvin, J., and Beatty, C.J., concurred.


Summaries of

People v. St. Maurice

Supreme Court of California,In Bank
Sep 24, 1913
166 Cal. 201 (Cal. 1913)

In People v. St. Maurice, 166 Cal. 201, 135 P. 952, where code provisions provided that if in a criminal action the judgment is a fine, with or without imprisonment, execution may issue thereon as on a judgment in a civil action and other code provisions declared such a judgment constitutes a lien in like manner as a judgment for money rendered in a civil action, the Supreme Court of California, in ruling on the question "What is the effect of the death of a defendant adjudged to pay a fine, when death occurs pending the appeal from such judgment?"

Summary of this case from State v. Stotter

In People v. St. Maurice, 166 Cal. 201 [ 135 P. 952], the appellant, who had been found guilty and ordered to pay a fine by the trial court, died pending the appeal.

Summary of this case from People v. Alexander
Case details for

People v. St. Maurice

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. CHERRY De ST. MAURICE, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of California,In Bank

Date published: Sep 24, 1913

Citations

166 Cal. 201 (Cal. 1913)
135 P. 952

Citing Cases

State v. Stotter

The general rule is that a judgment for a fine imposed as a punishment for an offense is abated by the death…

State v. Free

State v. Furth, (Wash.) 144 P. 907; Boyd v. State, 108 P. 431; People v. St. Maurice, 135 P. 952; Mickle v.…