From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 25, 1993
191 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 25, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Martin H. Rettinger, J.).


In this retrial of charges arising from the gunpoint robbery of a part-time livery cab driver and his common-law wife by their passenger, the prosecutor, on redirect examination, impermissibly bolstered the driver's description of the perpetrator's facial hair by eliciting his prior consistent statements made at the first trial, which delved into unrelated aspects of the description without even attempting to clarify the subject matter of the cross-examination bearing upon the issue (see, People v Melendez, 55 N.Y.2d 445, 451-452). This, coupled with the prosecutor's repetitive and haranguing comments in summation, a practice repeatedly condemned by this Court (People v. Martin, 172 A.D.2d 268, 270; see also, People v. Clemons, 166 A.D.2d 363, 366), that defendant, who admitted lying at the first trial about his activities earlier in the day of the robbery, had lied about other matters as well, and his vouching for the credibility of one of the police witnesses, cumulatively served to prejudice defendant and deprive him of a fair trial, especially where the evidence of guilt was not overwhelming, the first trial having ended with a hung jury (see, People v. Hansen, 141 A.D.2d 417, lv withdrawn 72 N.Y.2d 919; People v. Shanis, 36 N.Y.2d 697). Although unpreserved by appropriate objection, we consider the question of the prosecutor's improper comments during summation in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15 [a]).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Bell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 25, 1993
191 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LAWRENCE BELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 25, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 191

Citing Cases

People v. Goldstein

Even if any one or a combination of the statements at issue could be considered harmless, "ultimately,…

People v. Goldstein

Even if any one or a combination of the statements at issue could be considered harmless, "ultimately,…