People v. Bartow

2 Citing briefs

  1. PEOPLE v. PEREZ

    Respondent’s Petition for Review

    Filed November 14, 2016

    Its admission must comport with the rules of evidence, particularly the hearsay rule and exceptions thereto. (See People v. Woodell, supra, 17 Cal.4th at pp. 457-460; People v. Reed, supra, 13 Cal.4th at pp. 220, 224-228, 230-231; People v. Bartow, supra, 46 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1579-1580.) Thus, although part of the record of conviction, the appellate opinion will not necessarily be relevant or admissible in its entirety.

  2. PEOPLE v. ESTRADA

    Appellant’s Petition for Review

    Filed January 28, 2016

    (See People v. Johnson and Machado (2015) 61 Cal.4th 674, 680-681.) Proposition 36, however, also 3/ An extensive body of case law developed concerning what documents and materials were properly includedin the “entire record” of a prior conviction (See e.g., People v. Bartow (1996) 46 Cal.App.4th 1573 [transcripts of testimony]; Peoplev. ~~Goodner(1991)226Cal-App.3d609[admissions]; Peoplev.