People ex Rel. Davis

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third DepartmentOct 1, 1992
587 N.Y.S.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
587 N.Y.S.2d 816186 A.D.2d 844

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • People v. Davis

    …Washington County Court Judge Gordon M. Hemmett, Jr., denied Defendant's application, without hearing. See…

  • People ex Rel. Martinez v. West

    …The record reveals that petitioner could have and/or did raise this issue on direct appeal from the judgment…

lock 2 Citing caseskeyboard_arrow_right

October 1, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Washington County (Hemmett, Jr., J.).

We find that Supreme Court properly denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner's allegations concerning his indictment could have been raised on direct appeal or by way of a CPL article 440 motion (see, People ex rel. Rosado v Miles, 138 A.D.2d 808). Further, the facts alleged by petitioner do not merit a departure from traditional orderly procedure (see, People ex rel. Grady v LeFevre, 152 A.D.2d 850, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 702). Were we to consider petitioner's allegation that the indictment was defective and did not serve to convey jurisdiction to County Court because, inter alia, the Grand Jury foreman failed to sign the indictment, we would find that the certified copy of the indictment in the record belies petitioner's claims and establishes that the indictment was valid (see, CPLR 4540 [a]).

Weiss, P.J., Levine, Mercure, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

An alternative to Lexis that does not break the bank.

Casetext does more than Lexis for less than $65 per month.