Penrod
v.
State

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth DistrictJul 2, 1993
621 So. 2d 473 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • Holmes v. State

    …Affirmance is without prejudice for appellant to raise these claims by proper motion in the trial court. See…

lock 1 Citing casekeyboard_arrow_right

No. 93-683.

May 18, 1993. On Motion for Rehearing July 2, 1993.

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County; John Dean Moxley, Jr., Judge.

Arthur Raymond Penrod, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.


ON MOTION FOR REHEARING


DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appellant has sought a rehearing because the trial court improperly relied on out-of-state convictions to habitualize him under section 775.084, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988). Because appellant failed to raise this argument before the trial court in his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct sentence, his motion for rehearing is denied without prejudice to his raising this ground for relief in another 3.800(a) motion below. See Johnson v. State, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.), revised, 18 Fla. L. Weekly S234 (Fla. April 8, 1993).

DENIED.

HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.