From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pennix v. Standford

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 27, 2017
No. 17-6259 (4th Cir. Jun. 27, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-6259

06-27-2017

WILLIE PENNIX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SGT STANDFORD; LT DRUMMOND; OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Defendants - Appellees.

Willie Pennix, Appellant Pro Se. Ankush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01643-RDB) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Pennix, Appellant Pro Se. Ankush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Willie Pennix appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pennix v. Standford, No. 1:16-cv-01643-RDB (D. Md. Feb. 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Pennix v. Standford

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 27, 2017
No. 17-6259 (4th Cir. Jun. 27, 2017)
Case details for

Pennix v. Standford

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE PENNIX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SGT STANDFORD; LT DRUMMOND…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 27, 2017

Citations

No. 17-6259 (4th Cir. Jun. 27, 2017)