From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pedraza v. Alameda Unified School District

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 6, 2009
No C 05-4977 VRW (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2009)

Opinion

No C 05-4977 VRW.

January 6, 2009


ORDER


On December 12, 2008, plaintiff Linda Pedraza ("Plaintiff") filed a statement requesting that the undersigned recuse himself. Doc #153. Plaintiff previously filed the same request, Doc #125 at 9, which the court denied because plaintiff had not enumerated any facts suggesting personal bias or prejudice by the undersigned. Doc #150 at 5. Plaintiff still has not alleged any facts to support a substitution of judge. Accordingly, plaintiff's request for a substitution of judge, Doc #153, is DENIED.

Plaintiff also moves for a renotice of all previously terminated "motions, reconsiderations and filings." Doc #153 at 2. Because plaintiff has not obtained leave from the court to file a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Civ L R 7-9(a), plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is not properly before the court and will not be considered. To the extent it was docketed as a motion, the clerk is directed to terminate Doc #153.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pedraza v. Alameda Unified School District

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 6, 2009
No C 05-4977 VRW (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2009)
Case details for

Pedraza v. Alameda Unified School District

Case Details

Full title:LINDA PEDRAZA, individually and on behalf of her son, Michael Pedraza, and…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Jan 6, 2009

Citations

No C 05-4977 VRW (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2009)