From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peacock v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 22, 1974
206 S.E.2d 582 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

49190.

SUBMITTED APRIL 1, 1974.

DECIDED APRIL 22, 1974.

Theft by taking. Dodge Superior Court. Before Judge O'Connor.

Phillip R. West, for appellant.

Albert D. Mullis, District Attorney, for appellee.


The defendant was tried and convicted of theft by taking. An appeal based upon the general grounds was filed and the case is here for review. Held:

Recent possession of stolen goods without a reasonable explanation thereof will authorize a conviction of theft by taking. Voyles v. State, 115 Ga. App. 690 ( 155 S.E.2d 710). In the case sub judice it was a question for the jury whether the appellant's explanation of his possession of the property was satisfactory. Coley v. State, 41 Ga. App. 620 (2) ( 154 S.E. 203); Chubbs v. State, 204 Ga. 762 (1) ( 51 S.E.2d 851).

Judgment affirmed. Bell, C. J., and Clark, J., concur.

SUBMITTED APRIL 1, 1974 — DECIDED APRIL 22, 1974.


Summaries of

Peacock v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 22, 1974
206 S.E.2d 582 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

Peacock v. State

Case Details

Full title:PEACOCK v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 22, 1974

Citations

206 S.E.2d 582 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)
131 Ga. App. 651

Citing Cases

Williamson v. State

Although appellant offered an explanation of his possession of the stolen property, "`[i]t was within the…

Rutledge v. State

" Mathews v. State, 103 Ga. App. 743 ( 120 S.E.2d 359); Floyd v. State, 137 Ga. App. 181 ( 223 S.E.2d 230).…