From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paul v. S.C. Dep't of Transp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 8, 2017
No. 17-1057 (4th Cir. Jun. 8, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-1057

06-08-2017

RONALD I. PAUL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONS; PAUL D. DE HOLCZER, individually and as a partner of the law firm of Moses, Koon & Brackett, PC; MICHAEL H. QUINN, individually and as senior lawyer of Quinn Law Firm, LLC; OSCAR K. RUCKER, in his individual capacity as Director, Rights of Way South Carolina Department of Transportation; MACIE M. GRESHAM, in her individual capacity as Eastern Region Right of Way Program Manager South Carolina Department of Transportation; NATALIE J. MOORE, in her individual capacity as Assistant Chief Counsel, South Carolina Department of Transportation; J. CHARLES ORMOND, JR., individually and as partner of the Law Firm of Holler, Dennis, Corbett, Ormond, Plante & Garner, Defendants - Appellees.

Ronald I. Paul, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-01727-CMC) Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald I. Paul, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ronald I. Paul appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and imposing a prefiling injunction against him. Paul also appeals the court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in either order. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Paul v. S.C. Dep't of Transp., No. 3:16-cv-01727-CMC (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 2016 & Jan. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Paul v. S.C. Dep't of Transp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 8, 2017
No. 17-1057 (4th Cir. Jun. 8, 2017)
Case details for

Paul v. S.C. Dep't of Transp.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD I. PAUL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 8, 2017

Citations

No. 17-1057 (4th Cir. Jun. 8, 2017)