From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pauk v. Board of Trustees of the City University of New York

U.S.
Mar 8, 1982
455 U.S. 1000 (1982)

Summary

holding that limitations period under § 1983 began to run when plaintiff received final notification from the University that he was being discharged

Summary of this case from I.D. v. Westmoreland School Dist.

Opinion

No. 81-1091.

March 8, 1982, October TERM, 1981.


C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 654 F. 2d 856.


Summaries of

Pauk v. Board of Trustees of the City University of New York

U.S.
Mar 8, 1982
455 U.S. 1000 (1982)

holding that limitations period under § 1983 began to run when plaintiff received final notification from the University that he was being discharged

Summary of this case from I.D. v. Westmoreland School Dist.

finding picketing in protest of discriminatory practices to be protected activity

Summary of this case from Parker v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.

striking down curfew

Summary of this case from Harrison v. Schwartz

applying Missouri law

Summary of this case from Sutherland v. Elpower Corp.

applying Missouri law

Summary of this case from Donahue v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

noting that the arbitrary and capricious standard "applies to all cases"

Summary of this case from Central States Enterprises, Inc. v. I.C.C

applying Missouri law

Summary of this case from Roth v. Black Decker, U.S., Inc.

contrasting disclosure of fact or opinion work product to third parties with common interest and free and voluntary disclosure to third party, including adversary, demonstrating conscious disregard of confidentiality provided by work-product doctrine

Summary of this case from O'Boyle v. Borough of Longport
Case details for

Pauk v. Board of Trustees of the City University of New York

Case Details

Full title:PAUK v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 8, 1982

Citations

455 U.S. 1000 (1982)

Citing Cases

Carreras v. City of Anaheim

In the case before us, however, Pullman abstention is not appropriate because there is no "substantial…

Smith v. Texas Dept. of Water Resources

As indicated in note 1, supra, had she accepted the assignment and then filed a proper complaint, she clearly…