Patton v. Dole

2 Citing briefs

  1. Chevron Corporation v. Donziger et al

    MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 77 Order, Set Deadlines/Hearings,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. Document

    Filed February 25, 2011

    “[P]reliminary injunctive relief is an extraordinary remedy and should not be routinely granted.” Patton v. Dole, 806 F.2d at 28; accord No Spray Coal., Inc. v. City of New York, 252 F.3d 148, 150 (2d Cir. 2001). “A party seeking a preliminary injunction in this Circuit must show: (1) irreparable harm in the absence of the injunction and (2) either (a) a likelihood of success on the merits or (b) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation and a balance of hardships tipping decidedly in the movant’s favor.”

  2. Mental Hygiene Legal Services v. Paterson et al

    MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction.. Document

    Filed April 16, 2007

    06 (f) is an injury that cannot adequately be recompensed with monetary damages calculated after the fact. See Patton v. Dole, 806 F.2d 24, 28 (2d Cir. 1986) (“[M]onetary damages for . . . loss of liberty would not only be difficult to ascertain, but would, in any event, constitute inadequate recompense.”).