From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parlato v. Abbott Laboratories

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 18, 1989
886 F.2d 1429 (4th Cir. 1989)

Opinion

No. 87-1762.

Argued May 5, 1988.

Decided October 18, 1989.

Benjamin Lipsitz, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Harold D. Murry, Jr. (Robert P. Reznick, Clifford Warnke; Paul Mark Sandler, Frishtat Sandler; Catherine A. Sazdanoff, Office of General Counsel, Abbott Laboratories on brief), for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Court Judge. (CA-85-4637-S).

Before PHILLIPS and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and KAUFMAN, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation.


On June 30, 1988, this Court filed and published an opinion in this case. 850 F.2d 203. Therein, this Court relied upon Makovi v. Sherwin-Williams Co., 75 Md. App. 58, 540 A.2d 494 (1988). Subsequently, the Court of Appeals of Maryland undertook certiorari review in that case and, upon the petition of counsel for appellants in this case, we withdrew our June 30, 1988 opinion and held this case sub curia pending disposition of Makovi by the Court of Appeals of Maryland.

On July 26, 1989, the Court of Appeals of Maryland, by a 4-3 majority, filed an opinion in Makovi affirming the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Accordingly, we hereby reinstate our June 30, 1988 opinion and reaffirm our conclusion in it affirming the district court for the reasons stated in Makovi by Maryland's highest court.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Parlato v. Abbott Laboratories

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 18, 1989
886 F.2d 1429 (4th Cir. 1989)
Case details for

Parlato v. Abbott Laboratories

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES F. PARLATO; JACKIE PARLATO, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 18, 1989

Citations

886 F.2d 1429 (4th Cir. 1989)

Citing Cases

Kerrigan v. Magnum Entertainment Inc.

Other courts interpreting Adler have come to similar conclusions. See, e.g., Childers v. Chesapeake Potomac…

Conkwright v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

Both the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Court of Appeals of Maryland hold that the tort of abusive…