From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 5, 2014
149 So. 3d 754 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 3D11–868.

11-05-2014

Antawn PARHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Eugene F. Zenobi, Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Third Region, and Roberta G. Mandel, Special Assistant Regional Counsel, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Eugene F. Zenobi, Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Third Region, and Roberta G. Mandel, Special Assistant Regional Counsel, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Nikole Hiciano, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before WELLS, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ferguson v. State, 789 So.2d 306, 314–15 (Fla.2001) (affirming trial court's finding of competency where court's rejection of defense experts' opinions was supported by testimony of three doctors who found evidence of malingering and by testimony of corrections officers that defendant only acted irrationally shortly before and after mental evaluations).


Summaries of

Parham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 5, 2014
149 So. 3d 754 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Parham v. State

Case Details

Full title:Antawn PARHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Nov 5, 2014

Citations

149 So. 3d 754 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)