From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parham v. McDonald's Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Apr 20, 2011
Case No.: 3:11-cv-00511-MMC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:11-cv-00511-MMC.

April 20, 2011

RANDALL L. ALLEN (SBN 264067), PALANI P. RATHINASAMY (SBN 269852), ALSTON BIRD LLP, Menlo Park, CA, JANE FUGATE THORPE ( Pro Hac Vice), SCOTT A. ELDER ( Pro Hac Vice), ALSTON BIRD LLP, Atlanta, GA, Attorneys for Defendants, MCDONALD'S CORPORATION and MCDONALD'S USA, LLC.

GEORGE RICHARD BAKER (SBN 224003), BAKER LAW, P.C., Birmingham, AL, Attorney for Plaintiff MONET PARHAM.


[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER; DEEMING MOTION TO DISMISS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE


The Court has received the Parties Stipulated Request for Revised Scheduling Order. Good cause appearing, the Request for Revised Scheduling Order is

GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following schedule be entered:

Plaintiff's Deadline to File Motion to Remand — April 25, 2011

Defendants' Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand — May 31, 2011

Plaintiff's Deadline to Reply in Support of Motion to Remand — June 30, 2011

Hearing on Motion to Remand — July 15, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.

Defendants' Deadline to File Motion to Dismiss — Date of Order denying remand + 21 days

Plaintiff's Deadline to Respond to Motion to Dismiss — Date of Order denying remand + 66 days

Defendants' Deadline to Reply In Support of Motion to Dismiss — Date of Order denying remand + 86 days

In light of the above, the Court deems defendants' motion to dismiss, filed April 18, 2011 and noticed for hearing June 24, 2011, WITHDRAWN without prejudice to refiling.


Summaries of

Parham v. McDonald's Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Apr 20, 2011
Case No.: 3:11-cv-00511-MMC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Parham v. McDonald's Corporation

Case Details

Full title:MONET PARHAM, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Apr 20, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 3:11-cv-00511-MMC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2011)