From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. Selpan Electric Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 2004
5 A.D.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Summary

In Palmer v. Selpan Elec. Co. (5 AD3d 248), on nearly identical facts, this Court reversed the denial of a CPLR 1021 motion and dismissed the complaint.

Summary of this case from Washington v. Min Chung Hwan

Opinion

2993.

Decided March 18, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Salerno, J.), entered June 2, 2003, which denied defendants' motion to dismiss the action for failure to appoint and substitute a representative for the estate of the deceased plaintiff, without prejudice to renewal "upon a showing of undue delay in the appointment of an administrator," unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion granted.

David Holmes, for Plaintiff.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Friedman, JJ.


It has been six years since the accident, five years since the commencement of the action, and four years since the death of the plaintiff. No representative has been substituted, despite numerous attempts over the last three years, by plaintiff's attorney, to have plaintiff's father appoint a representative. Accordingly, since substitution has not been made "within a reasonable time," defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 1021 should have been granted.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Palmer v. Selpan Electric Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 18, 2004
5 A.D.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

In Palmer v. Selpan Elec. Co. (5 AD3d 248), on nearly identical facts, this Court reversed the denial of a CPLR 1021 motion and dismissed the complaint.

Summary of this case from Washington v. Min Chung Hwan
Case details for

Palmer v. Selpan Electric Co.

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE PALMER, Plaintiff, v. SELPAN ELECTRIC CO., INC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 18, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 248 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
773 N.Y.S.2d 289

Citing Cases

Washington v. Min Chung Hwan

Pursuant to CPLR 1021, if a party dies "and timely substitution has not been made, the court, before…

UMS Solutions, Inc. v. Biosound Esaote, Inc.

As to the issue of reasonable time, courts have held "CPLR 1021 requires a motion for substitution to be made…