From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Page v. Furmer

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 27, 2006
Civil Case No. 05-cv-00624-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 27, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 05-cv-00624-REB-BNB.

January 27, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


The matters before me are (1) the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#50], filed January 10, 2006; and (2) the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#51], filed January 10, 2006. No objections having been filed to either recommendation, I review them only for plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration Naturalization Service, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005). Finding no such error in the magistrate judge's recommended disposition of the motions at issue, I find and conclude that the recommendation should be approved and adopted. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

This standard pertains even though plaintiff is proceeding pro se. Morales-Fernandez, 418 F.3d at 1122.

1. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#50], filed January 10, 2006, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court;

2. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#51], filed January 10, 2006, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court;

3. That the State Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Supporting Authorities Included Herein) [#32], filed August 24, 2005, is GRANTED IN PART;

4. That Defendant DeCesaro's Motion for Summary Judgment or In the Alternative Motion to Dismiss Complaint [#17], filed July 28, 2005, is GRANTED IN PART;

5. That the motions are GRANTED with respect to plaintiff's Claims One and Two, and those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

6. That the motions are otherwise DENIED;

7. That I will decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claim, and accordingly plaintiff's Claim Three is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

8. That judgment SHALL ENTER against plaintiff, James Page, and in favor of defendants Mark Farmer, Judy Bullard, Gary Golder, Michael Gilbert, and Anthony A. DeCesaro as to plaintiff's Claims One and Two; and

9. That defendants are AWARDED their costs to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.Colo.LCivR. 54.1.


Summaries of

Page v. Furmer

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 27, 2006
Civil Case No. 05-cv-00624-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 27, 2006)
Case details for

Page v. Furmer

Case Details

Full title:JAMES PAGE, Plaintiff, v. MARK FURMER, JUDY BOLLARD, GARY GOLDER, MICHAEL…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jan 27, 2006

Citations

Civil Case No. 05-cv-00624-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 27, 2006)