holding that the ripeness issue "may be raised sua sponte if not raised by the parties"
Summary of this case from Hawaii Newspaper Agency v. BronsterNo. 91-584.
November 4, 1991.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 922 F. 2d 498.
holding that the ripeness issue "may be raised sua sponte if not raised by the parties"
Summary of this case from Hawaii Newspaper Agency v. Bronsterholding that the ripeness issue "may be raised sua sponte if not raised by the parties."
Summary of this case from Edwards v. Ellsworth, May, Sudweeks, Stubbs, Ibsenconcluding that if there was a Rule 11 violation, it was harmless error where the defendant was "actually aware" of the statutory maximum and minimum sentences in that the indictment and plea agreement advised the defendant of the statutory maximum and minimum sentences; the defendant had a copy of the indictment before him at the plea hearing; the defendant indicated at the hearing that he had read the plea agreement; and the prosecutor advised the defendant during the hearing of the statutory minimum and mandatory sentences
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Gustavo-Martinez-CruzFull title:SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION CO. ET AL. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Nov 4, 1991
However, futile variance requests or re-applications are not required. See Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal…
United States v. Clarkson Auto Elec. Inc.(08-CV-6107). Following their arraignments, Anthony Fretto, Gerald Fretto, LaVilla and CAE requested a…