From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

One, Incorporated, v. Olesen

U.S.
Jan 13, 1958
355 U.S. 371 (1958)

Summary

In One, Inc. v. Olesen, 355 U.S. 371, 78 S.Ct. 364, 2 L.Ed.2d 352 and Sunshine Book Co. v. Summerfield, 355 U.S. 372, 78 S.Ct. 365, 2 L.Ed.2d 352, the courts below had found in no uncertain terms that the material was obscene within the meaning of Section 1461.

Summary of this case from Grove Press, Inc. v. Christenberry

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

No. 290.

Decided January 13, 1958.

241 F.2d 772, reversed.

Eric Julber for petitioner.

Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Leonard and Samuel D. Slade for respondent.


The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is reversed. Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476.


Summaries of

One, Incorporated, v. Olesen

U.S.
Jan 13, 1958
355 U.S. 371 (1958)

In One, Inc. v. Olesen, 355 U.S. 371, 78 S.Ct. 364, 2 L.Ed.2d 352 and Sunshine Book Co. v. Summerfield, 355 U.S. 372, 78 S.Ct. 365, 2 L.Ed.2d 352, the courts below had found in no uncertain terms that the material was obscene within the meaning of Section 1461.

Summary of this case from Grove Press, Inc. v. Christenberry
Case details for

One, Incorporated, v. Olesen

Case Details

Full title:ONE, INCORPORATED, v . OLESEN, POSTMASTER OF LOS ANGELES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 13, 1958

Citations

355 U.S. 371 (1958)
78 S. Ct. 364

Citing Cases

United States v. Klaw

For convenience we list chronologically the Supreme Court's relevant "obscenity" and censorship decisions.…

Austin v. United States

I am unable to find any case in which the conclusion of In re Fried has been extended to cover the kind of…