From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ohrn v. Wright

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 10, 2007
963 So. 2d 298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Summary

In Ohrn v. Wright, 963 So.2d 298 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007), at a hearing on a repeat violence injunction, the trial court did not permit Ohrn to call a witness who would support her version of the incidents that occurred between the parties.

Summary of this case from Cirillo v. Jones

Opinion

No. 5D06-4068.

August 10, 2007.

Non-Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Alice Blackwell-White, Judge.

Bart Schneider, of Bart Schneider, PA, Orlando, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.


We reverse the final judgment of injunction for protection against repeat violence entered pursuant to section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2006). We do so because the transcript of the hearing reflects that the trial court did not swear either witness and did not permit the appellant, Kimberly Ohrn, to call a witness who could have offered testimony to support her version of the incidents that had occurred between the parties. These actions constituted a due process violation.

Section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2006), requires a "full hearing" prior to entering a permanent injunction against repeat violence. To satisfy the constitutional and statutory imperative of due process, at an injunction hearing, the parties must have an opportunity to prove or disprove the allegations made in the complaint. All witnesses should be sworn, each party should be permitted to call witnesses with relevant information, and cross-examination should be permitted. Utley v. Baez-Camacho, 743 So.2d 613, 614 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). While we are sympathetic to the time constraints faced by busy trial courts, we cannot ignore the dictates of the Florida Statutes or the requirements of fundamental due process concerning the procedures to be utilized in making critical decisions of this nature. See Lewis v. Lewis, 689 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

Section 784.046(6)(a), Florida Statutes (2006), which governs injunctions for repeat violence, states, in pertinent part:

(6)(a) When it appears to the court that an immediate and present danger of violence exists, the court may grant a temporary injunction which may be granted in an ex parte hearing, pending a full bearing , and may grant such relief as the court deems proper, including an injunction enjoining the respondent from committing any acts of violence.

(Emphasis added).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ORFINGER, MONACO and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ohrn v. Wright

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Aug 10, 2007
963 So. 2d 298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

In Ohrn v. Wright, 963 So.2d 298 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007), at a hearing on a repeat violence injunction, the trial court did not permit Ohrn to call a witness who would support her version of the incidents that occurred between the parties.

Summary of this case from Cirillo v. Jones
Case details for

Ohrn v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:Kimberly OHRN, Appellant, v. Ashlee Jewel WRIGHT, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Aug 10, 2007

Citations

963 So. 2d 298 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Furry v. Rickles

To satisfy due process requirements at an injunction hearing, the parties must have a reasonable opportunity…

Tejeda-Soto v. Raimondi

Section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2005), the statute governing injunctions against repeat violence,…