From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ntombela v. Holder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 29, 2014
14-CV-0785C (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 29, 2014)

Opinion

14-CV-0785C

10-29-2014

QHUBEKA NTOMBELA, Petitioner, v. ERIC HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States, e al., Defendans.


ORDER

Petitioner, Qhubeka Ntombela, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his continued administrative custody/detention pending removal. (Docket No. 1). Respondents have filed a motion to dismiss the petition as moot inasmuch as petitioner has been released from administrative detention pending removal pursuant to an Order of Supervision and Addendum, executed on October 14, 2014. (Docket No. 4, Motion to Dismiss, Affidavit of Gail Y. Mitchell, sworn to October 22, 2014, ¶ 4, and Exh. A-Order of Supervision and Addendum).

Accordingly, in light of the fact that petitioner has been released from administrative detention, the respondents' motion to dismiss the petition is granted and the petition is dismissed. See Masoud v. Filip, No. 08-CV-6345-CJS(VEB), 2009 WL 223006 (W.D.N.Y., January 27, 2009) (confirming Report and Recommendation of U.S.M.J. Victor E. Bianchini) (petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 seeking release from detention pending removal moot upon release of petitioner from detention pursuant to an Order of Supervision); see also Leybinsky v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 553 Fed.Appx. 108 , 2014 WL 503188 (2d Cir., Feb. 10, 2014) (Summary Order) (petitioner's release from ICE custody pending removal pursuant to a final order of removal moots his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and the "capable of repetition but evading review" exception to mootness doctrine inapplicable.)

The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward a copy of this Order to petitioner at the address set forth in the Order of Supervision: 301 Franklin Street, Ithaca, New York 14850.

The Court hereby certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this judgment would not be taken in good faith and therefore denies leave to appeal as a poor person. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962).

Petitioner must file any notice of appeal with the Clerk's Office, United States District Court, Western District of New York, within sixty (60) days of the date of judgment in this action. Requests to proceed on appeal as a poor person must be filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in accordance with the requirements of Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that the petition is dismissed; and

FURTHER, that leave to appeal as a poor person is denied.

SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

JOHN T. CURTIN

United States District Judge
DATED: 10/29, 2014

Buffalo, New York


Summaries of

Ntombela v. Holder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 29, 2014
14-CV-0785C (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 29, 2014)
Case details for

Ntombela v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:QHUBEKA NTOMBELA, Petitioner, v. ERIC HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 29, 2014

Citations

14-CV-0785C (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 29, 2014)