From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Northern Securities Co. v. United States

U.S.
Nov 30, 1903
191 U.S. 555 (1903)

Summary

discussing discretionary standard for permitting amicus filings

Summary of this case from Larson v. Allina Health Sys.

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.

No. 277.

Submitted November 16, 1903. Decided November 30, 1903.

Motion for leave to file brief as amicus curiae denied.

Mr. A.A. Hoehling, Jr., for Mr. Charles Fisk Beach, applicant.


In support of this motion certain letters were presented showing that request was made of counsel for the respective parties for their consent to the application, and that they withheld direct consent, leaving the matter entirely to the court to determine. When the motion was submitted objection to the granting of leave was made by counsel for appellees.

Where in a pending case application to file briefs is made by counsel not employed therein, but interested in some other pending case involving similar questions, and consent is given, the court has always exercised great liberality in permitting this to be done. And doubtless it is within our discretion to allow it in any case when justified by the circumstances. Green v. Biddle, 8 Wheat. 1, 17; Florida v. Georgia, 17 How. 478, 491; The Gray Jacket, 5 Wall. 370. It does not appear that applicant is interested in any other case which will be affected by the decision of this case; as the parties are represented by competent counsel, the need of assistance cannot be assumed; and consent has not been given.

Leave to file must, therefore, be

Denied.


Summaries of

Northern Securities Co. v. United States

U.S.
Nov 30, 1903
191 U.S. 555 (1903)

discussing discretionary standard for permitting amicus filings

Summary of this case from Larson v. Allina Health Sys.
Case details for

Northern Securities Co. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:NORTHERN SECURITIES COMPANY v . UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 30, 1903

Citations

191 U.S. 555 (1903)
24 S. Ct. 119

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Rosen

And in this regard, district courts have inherent discretion to allow or deny the appearance of an amicus.…

U.S. v. State of Mich

Funbus Sys., Inc. v. California Pub. Until. Comm'n, 801 F.2d 1120, 1124-25 (9th Cir. 1986); Krislov, The…