Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First DepartmentJun 24, 2008
859 N.Y.S.2d 368 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
859 N.Y.S.2d 36852 A.D.3d 4122008 N.Y. Slip Op. 5763

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • Reingold v. Golia

    …GOLIA's failure to execute the Al Rasheed retainer does not allow GOLIA to evade payment to R & T under…

  • Nabi v. Sells

    …The aspects of the contingency fee retainer agreement prepared by defendants and signed by plaintiff that…

lock 5 Citing caseskeyboard_arrow_right

No. 3999.

June 24, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. Gische, J), entered April 26, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants' cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Ross Asmar LLC, New York (Steven B. Ross of counsel), for appellants.

Nicoll Davis Spinella LLP, New York (Jack T. Spinella of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Gonzalez, Buckley and Catterson, JJ.

Plaintiff law firm's failure to comply with the rules on retainer agreements ( 22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude it from suing to recover legal fees for services provided ( see Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54).

[ See 2007 NY Slip Op 30942(U).]