From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neely v. Director, California Department of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 26, 2008
No. CIV S-08-1416 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-1416 KJM P.

June 26, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.


Summaries of

Neely v. Director, California Department of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 26, 2008
No. CIV S-08-1416 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2008)
Case details for

Neely v. Director, California Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM STEWART NEELY, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 26, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-08-1416 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 26, 2008)