From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nash v. Levy

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Oct 24, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 87628 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

Motion No: 2011-02630 Index No. 22065/01 M127331

10-24-2011

In the Matter of Luke Nash, appellant, v. Harold Levy, etc., respondent.


, J.P.

THOMAS A. DICKERSON

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS

JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Application by the appellant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.8(d)(2) to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 10, 2011.

Upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the order is not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701[b][1]), and leave to appeal has not been granted; and it is further,

ORDERED that the application is denied as academic.

FLORIO, J.P., DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and COHEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Matthew G. Kiernan

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Nash v. Levy

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Oct 24, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 87628 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Nash v. Levy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Luke Nash, appellant, v. Harold Levy, etc., respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 87628 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Citing Cases

Timmons v. Clayton

In 12 A.L.R.2d 1338, there is an Annotation entitled: "Liability, as regards surface waters, for raising…

Moody v. Town of Wetumpka

Appellants' town lots are excepted from the general rule of subserviency to the natural flowage of surface or…