October 11, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly determined that its prior dismissal of a similar action between the parties was based on the plaintiff's neglect to prosecute (see, Flans v. Federal Ins. Co., 43 N.Y.2d 881; Keel v. Parke, Davis Co., 72 A.D.2d 546, affd 50 N.Y.2d 833; Ivory v. Eckstrom, 98 A.D.2d 763; Kelly v Rosenthal, 176 A.D.2d 283). Accordingly, the plaintiff was not entitled to the six-month savings provision contained in CPLR 205 (a), and her present action was properly dismissed as time barred. Rosenblatt, J.P., O'Brien, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.