Murray
v.
Cannon

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISIONDec 4, 2018
Civil Action No. 2: 17-1152-RMG (D.S.C. Dec. 4, 2018)

Civil Action No. 2: 17-1152-RMG

12-05-2018

Christopher A. Murray, Plaintiff, v. J. Al Cannon, Jr., Sheriff for Charleston County, in his official capacity, Defendant.


ORDER AND OPINION

The Court, having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above action has been settled,

IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. If settlement is not consummated within sixty (60) days, either party may petition the Court to reopen this action and restore it to the calendar. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). In the alternative, to the extent permitted by law, either party may within sixty (60) days petition the Court to enforce the settlement, and the Court specifically retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement. See Fairfax County w ide Citizens v. Fairfax Cnty., 571 F.2d 1299 (4th Cir. 1978). The dismissal hereunder shall be with prejudice if no action is taken under either alternative within sixty (60) days from the filing date of this order.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Richard Mark Gergel


Richard Mark Gergel


United States District Court Judge December 5, 2018
Charleston, South Carolina