From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Murphy v. Giles

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Jul 18, 2012
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-224-MEF (M.D. Ala. Jul. 18, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-224-MEF

07-18-2012

JIMMY HARDEN MURPHY, # 162386 Plaintiff, v. SANDRA GILES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On June 18, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 33) in this case, to which Plaintiff has filed an Objection (Doc. # 38). After an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 33) is ADOPTED;
2. Plaintiff's Objection (Doc. # 38) is OVERRULED;
3. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction on his inadequate medical care and unsafe work conditions claims (Doc # 1) is DENIED;
4. Plaintiff's motion for permanent injunction on the unsafe work conditions claim (Doc. # 3) is DENIED; and
5. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

Mark E. Fuller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Murphy v. Giles

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Jul 18, 2012
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-224-MEF (M.D. Ala. Jul. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Murphy v. Giles

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY HARDEN MURPHY, # 162386 Plaintiff, v. SANDRA GILES, et al.…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 18, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-224-MEF (M.D. Ala. Jul. 18, 2012)