From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Munir v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2012
No. CIV S-05-1996 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1996 MCE EFB P

03-12-2012

MELVIN MUNIR, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff appears to be a former state prisoner, who proceeds without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Dckt. No 65, Notice of Change of Address (based on plaintiff's expected parole date). On March 31, 2009, the court denied defendant Thomas's motion for summary judgment and ordered the parties to file pretrial statements. Dckt. No. 59. Subsequently, plaintiff filed a pretrial statement and defendant Thomas appealed this court's order to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Dckt. No. 60. On March 6, 2012, Thomas's appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Dckt. No 66.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Thomas file a pretrial statement within 30 days from the date this order is filed.

____________________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Munir v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2012
No. CIV S-05-1996 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Munir v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN MUNIR, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 12, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1996 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2012)