Case No. 2:17-cv-01247-RFB-GWF
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 8] of the Honorable George Foley, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, entered June 14, 2019.
A district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is required to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct "any review," de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by June 28, 2019. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations. . . .
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Amended Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 8] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [ECF No. 5] is DISMISSED.
IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Clerk of the Court be instructed to close the case and enter judgment accordingly.
DATED: February 10, 2020.
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge