Morris
v.
Budge

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth CircuitMar 16, 2011
421 Fed. Appx. 768 (9th Cir. 2011)

No. 10-15688.

Submitted March 14, 2011.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed March 16, 2011.

Robert W. Story, Story Law Group, Reno, NV, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Charles Dejuan Morris, Carson City, NV, pro se.

Troy Curtis Jordan, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Nevada Attorney General, Carson City, NV, for Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Edward C. Reed, Senior District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 3:06-cv-00493-ECR-RAM.

Before: WALLACE, NOONAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Petitioner-Appellant Charles Dejuan Morris, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals from the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion.