From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morales v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 4, 2015
13 Civ. 06844 (LGS) (DF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2015)

Opinion

13 Civ. 06844 (LGS) (DF)

05-04-2015

LUCIANO MORALES, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant.


OPINION & ORDER :

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman (the "Report"), recommending that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted in part, and that Defendant's cross-motion be denied. For the reasons stated below, the Report is adopted in its entirety.

Plaintiff Luciano Morales brings this action against Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner"), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff Supplemental Security Disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The parties filed cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). On February 10, 2015, Judge Freeman issued the Report, to which no objection was filed.

A district court reviewing a magistrate judge's report and recommendation "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district court "may adopt those portions of the report to which no specific, written objection is made, as long as the factual and legal bases supporting the findings and conclusions set forth in those sections are not clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Adams v. N.Y.S. Dep't of Educ., 855 F. Supp. 2d 205, 206 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)).

The factual and legal bases underlying the Report are not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Accordingly, the Report is ADOPTED in its entirety as the decision of the Court. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff requests that his claim be remanded for further consideration of his mental impairments. Defendant's cross motion is DENIED.

The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Nos. 15 and 19 and to close this case.

SO ORDERED. Dated: May 4, 2015

New York, New York

/s/_________

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Morales v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 4, 2015
13 Civ. 06844 (LGS) (DF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Morales v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:LUCIANO MORALES, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 4, 2015

Citations

13 Civ. 06844 (LGS) (DF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 4, 2015)

Citing Cases

Warren I. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Because remand is necessary for further administrative proceedings, this court need not address plaintiff's…

Snyder v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

However, because the Court has already determined that remand of this matter for further proceedings is…