Moore
v.
State

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
Court of Appeals of AlabamaJan 30, 1934
152 So. 609 (Ala. Crim. App. 1934)
152 So. 60926 Ala. App. 60

8 Div. 900.

January 30, 1934.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Madison County; Paul Speake, Judge.

Hosie Moore was convicted of using a replaced license tag on an automobile, in violation of General Acts 1923, pp. 284, 292, § 24, and he appeals.

Reversed and remanded.

Brickell Johnston, of Huntsville, for appellant.

It is not the policy of the law to punish a man for doing something which he does not know, and has no means of knowing, that he is doing. Ignorantia facti excusat. Broom's Legal Maxims (8th Ed.) 252.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief did not reach the Reporter.


The evidence in this case, undisputed, is as follows:

The defendant was caught driving a car on which was a stolen and replaced tag. The car did not belong to defendant, and the defendant did not know, and had no knowledge of the fact, that the tag on the car was a replaced tag. The defendant was employed by the owner to drive the car to Huntsville, which he did in ignorance of the fact that the tag on the car was not legally there.

The charge in this case carries with it the intent to do the act, and, without knowing the fact, there can be no criminal intent. 16 Corpus Juris, 85(53)b.

The rulings of the court were not in accord with the above, and the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.