From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Long

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 30, 2014
NO. CV 13-8613-AG(E) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2014)

Opinion

NO. CV 13-8613-AG(E)

09-30-2014

STEVEN COURTNEY MOORE, Petitioner, v. DAVID B. LONG, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which any objections have been made. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Petition with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein by United States mail on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

DATED: September 30, 2014.

/s/_________

ANDREW J. GUILFORD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Moore v. Long

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 30, 2014
NO. CV 13-8613-AG(E) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2014)
Case details for

Moore v. Long

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN COURTNEY MOORE, Petitioner, v. DAVID B. LONG, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 30, 2014

Citations

NO. CV 13-8613-AG(E) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2014)