The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed November 2, 2010.
Bob Piatt, Esquire, Law Office of Bob Piatt, Granada Hills, CA, for Petitioner.
Shelley Goad, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Chief Counsel Ice, Office of the Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A072-943-945.
Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Ayman Ali Mohammad, a native and citizen of Jordan, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying his adjustment of status application. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to consider Mohammad's contentions regarding the denial of his 1-130 visa petition as they pertain to the BIA's August 27, 2007, order, and this petition for review is not timely as to that order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252; Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2003).