From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mixon-Davis v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COOKEVILLE DIVISION
Sep 12, 2012
No. 2:12-00019 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 12, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-00019

09-12-2012

EMILY V . MIXON-DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


Judge Nixon

Magistrate Judge Bryant


ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's Motion to Remand to Defendant ("Motion") (Doc. No. 19), filed with a Memorandum in Support (Doc. No. 20). Defendant requests that the case be remanded to an Administrative Law Judge to hold a hearing to obtain additional evidence. (Doc. No. 20.) Defendant avers that Plaintiff Emily V. Mixon-Davis does not object to the Motion. (Doc. No. 19.) Accordingly, the Motion is GRANTED; the Court hereby REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner below and REMANDS this case for further administrative proceedings.

It is so ORDERED.

______________

JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Mixon-Davis v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COOKEVILLE DIVISION
Sep 12, 2012
No. 2:12-00019 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Mixon-Davis v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:EMILY V . MIXON-DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COOKEVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Sep 12, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-00019 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 12, 2012)