From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Michigan Dept. of Ment. Hlth. v. Rasimas

U.S.
Apr 23, 1984
466 U.S. 950 (1984)

Summary

holding that unemployment benefits may never be deducted from a back pay award in a Title VII case

Summary of this case from Conklin v. Lovely

Opinion

No. 83-1258.

April 23, 1984, October TERM, 1983.


C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 714 F. 2d 614.


Summaries of

Michigan Dept. of Ment. Hlth. v. Rasimas

U.S.
Apr 23, 1984
466 U.S. 950 (1984)

holding that unemployment benefits may never be deducted from a back pay award in a Title VII case

Summary of this case from Conklin v. Lovely

finding no property interest in a permit issued to veterinarian to conduct tests on cattle “held at the sufferance and will of the officials charged with administering the permit program”

Summary of this case from Wilmina Shipping as v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

recognizing that such items may still be admissible if the police found item in place where one would reasonably have expected them to look in process of searching for objects described in sufficiently particular portions of warrant, police found item before they found all objects described in sufficiently particular portions, or the other requirements of the "plain view" rule are met

Summary of this case from Mullis v. Hopkins

stating that counsel's performance was deficient if it "fell below an objective standard of reasonableness"

Summary of this case from Mullis v. Hopkins
Case details for

Michigan Dept. of Ment. Hlth. v. Rasimas

Case Details

Full title:MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH v. RASIMAS

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 23, 1984

Citations

466 U.S. 950 (1984)

Citing Cases

Mullis v. Hopkins

Thus, only those items "not described in the sufficiently particular portions of the warrant" may be subject…

State v. Pratt

With this opinion we expressly adopt the severance doctrine. See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 984 F.2d…