Mejia
v.
Astrue

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANAMar 8, 2012
NO. 10-340-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Mar. 8, 2012)

NO. 10-340-JJB-SCR

03-08-2012

CHARLOTTE MEJIA, O/B/O J.E.M. v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY


CIVIL ACTION


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated March 7, 2011 (doc. no. 15) to which no objection has been filed.

Therefore, the court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the Motion to Supplement the Transcript filed by Charlotte Mejia, on behalf of her minor child J.E.M., is DENIED. Further, the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Charlotte Mejia, on behalf of her minor child J.E.M., considered as an appeal to the Commissioner's final decision denying the claim for children's Supplemental Security Income benefits is DENIED, and judgment is entered in the defendant's favor affirming the final decision of the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(a).

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 8th day of March, 2012.

__________________


JAMES J. BRADY, JUDGE


MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA