From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mehki L.W. v. Keyara J.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 27, 2019
173 A.D.3d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9759

06-27-2019

IN RE MEHKI L.W., Catholic Guardian Services, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Keyara J., Respondent–Appellant.

Andrew J. Baer, New York, for appellant. Magovern & Sclafani, Mineola (Joanna M. Roberson of counsel), for respondent. Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Marcia Egger of counsel), attorney for the child.


Andrew J. Baer, New York, for appellant.

Magovern & Sclafani, Mineola (Joanna M. Roberson of counsel), for respondent.

Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Marcia Egger of counsel), attorney for the child.

Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Singh, JJ.

Appeal from order, Family Court, New York County (Patria Frias–Colon, J.), entered on or about March 16, 2018, which denied respondent mother's motion to vacate a conditional surrender of the child, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

Prior to the finalization of an adoption, where there is a substantial failure of a material condition of a surrender executed pursuant to Social Services Law (SSL) § 383–c, Family Court may rehear the matter sua sponte, or upon petition by the agency, parent or attorney for the child (see Family Court Act § 1055–a [a] ). Here, however, it appears that the adoption of the child was finalized during the pendency of this appeal. Thus, the parties' rights will not be directly affected by our determination on this issue, and it is therefore moot (see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 714, 431 N.Y.S.2d 400, 409 N.E.2d 876 [1980] ). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

In any event, we find that the Family Court properly denied the mother's motion to vacate the conditional surrender. Although petitioner complied with the statutory notice requirements, the mother waited over a year in moving to vacate the surrender after she knew or should have known of the substantial failure of a material condition, namely that the foster father would no longer be an adoptive resource for the child (see SSL § 383–c[6][c] ; cf. Matter of Christopher F., 260 A.D.2d 97, 99–101, 701 N.Y.S.2d 171 [3d Dept. 1999] ). Moreover, it is undisputed that the mother failed to provide petitioner with her updated contact information, as required under the express terms of the judicial surrender (see SSL § 383–c[5][c][iii] ).

We have considered the parties' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Mehki L.W. v. Keyara J.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 27, 2019
173 A.D.3d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Mehki L.W. v. Keyara J.

Case Details

Full title:In re Mehki L.W., Catholic Guardian Services, Petitioner-Respondent, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 27, 2019

Citations

173 A.D.3d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
173 A.D.3d 629
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 5207

Citing Cases

Ginarte Gallardo Gonzalez & Winograd, LLP v. Schwitzer

The "interference must be intentional, not merely negligent or incidental to some other, lawful, purpose"…