From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mead Johnson Co. v. Goodman

U.S.
Jan 10, 1977
429 U.S. 1038 (1977)

Summary

finding that, under 18 U.S.C. § 641, which omits the word copies, "when an employee copies a record on government equipment without authorization, the duplicate copy is a record for purposes of the statute"

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Lang

Opinion

No. 76-174.

January 10, 1977.


C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 534 F. 2d 566.


Summaries of

Mead Johnson Co. v. Goodman

U.S.
Jan 10, 1977
429 U.S. 1038 (1977)

finding that, under 18 U.S.C. § 641, which omits the word copies, "when an employee copies a record on government equipment without authorization, the duplicate copy is a record for purposes of the statute"

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Lang

finding suit for cancer not barred by earlier discovery of thrombophlebitis, because taking of same drug could have exposed plaintiff to "separate risks" and could have produced phlebitis and cancer by separate chains of causality

Summary of this case from Hagerty v. L L Marine Services, Inc.

applying New Jersey law to contraceptive drugs

Summary of this case from Yung v. Raymark Industries, Inc.

applying New Jersey law

Summary of this case from Richardson v. Knud Hansen Memorial Hospital

discussing New Jersey law, which applies the two-disease rule

Summary of this case from Nelson v. A.W. Chesterton Co.

zoning ordinance inapplicable to Indian reservation

Summary of this case from All Mission Indian Housing Auth. v. Silvas

arguing that placing burden of proof on defendant would be unconstitutional

Summary of this case from United States v. Turner

involving improper conduct by state Department of Revenue employees

Summary of this case from In re Bellucci

applying New Jersey law to allow separate causes of action for thrombophlebitus and cancer resulting from the taking of a contraceptive drug on the rationale that the two diseases were not products of the same "chain of causality"

Summary of this case from Sheppard v. A.C. S. Co.
Case details for

Mead Johnson Co. v. Goodman

Case Details

Full title:MEAD JOHNSON Co. v. GOODMAN, EXECUTOR

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 10, 1977

Citations

429 U.S. 1038 (1977)

Citing Cases

United States v. Tarnopol

The appellants further contend that, whereas the district court presented to the jury an extensive…

United States v. Billingslea

The law of this Circuit is that separate takings punishable individually as misdemeanors cannot be aggregated…