From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLaughlin v. Wells Fargo Bank Na

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 21, 2016
No. C 15-02904 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2016)

Opinion

No. C 15-02904 WHA

09-21-2016

LATASHA MCLAUGHLIN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, Defendant.


ORDER REGARDING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION AND DENYING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AS MOOT WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL

The Court is in receipt of the parties' stipulation to extend certain deadlines. Two extensions have already been granted as to the deadlines for class notice (Dkt. No. 130, 142). The extension request is therefore DENIED except to the extent stated below.

The summary judgment motion has been pending since February. As a result of counsel's various postponements, the undersigned judge will be reported to Congress for failure to have ruled on the motion. The truth is that the delay is due to the postponement sought by counsel. The solution is to deny as moot the pending motion for summary judgment without prejudice to renewal if the current settlement in principal falls through. The summary judgment is therefore DENIED AS MOOT WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The motion for summary judgment must be re-noticed, if at all, BY OCTOBER 6, 2016.

Plaintiff's deadline to file any dispositive motion shall be continued from September 29, 2016, to OCTOBER 6, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 21, 2016.

/s/_________

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McLaughlin v. Wells Fargo Bank Na

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 21, 2016
No. C 15-02904 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2016)
Case details for

McLaughlin v. Wells Fargo Bank Na

Case Details

Full title:LATASHA MCLAUGHLIN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 21, 2016

Citations

No. C 15-02904 WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2016)