From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGinnis v. Ingram Equipment Co., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Feb 6, 1990
895 F.2d 1303 (11th Cir. 1990)

Opinion

No. 88-7596.

February 6, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges.

Senior U.S. Circuit Judge James C. Hill has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion November 14, 1989, 11th Cir., 888 F.2d 109)


A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc with oral argument during the week of June 11, 1990, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

McGinnis v. Ingram Equipment Co., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Feb 6, 1990
895 F.2d 1303 (11th Cir. 1990)
Case details for

McGinnis v. Ingram Equipment Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TERRELL McGINNIS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. INGRAM EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Feb 6, 1990

Citations

895 F.2d 1303 (11th Cir. 1990)

Citing Cases

McGinnis v. Ingram Equipment Co., Inc.

A more complete description of the facts in this case may be found in the district court's memorandum…

Carter v. South Cent. Bell

We are not dismissing the appellants' section 1981 claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See…