From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGahee v. Kennedy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 27, 1979
48 N.Y.2d 832 (N.Y. 1979)

Summary

finding that a conclusory defense of coercive influence to enforcement of separation agreement was not a bar to summary judgment

Summary of this case from Brengel v. Park Avenue Plaza Company

Opinion

Argued October 18, 1979

Decided November 27, 1979

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, HOWARD A. ZELLER, J.

Donald M. Sukloff for appellant.

Maurice P. O'Brien for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs; plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted and the case is remitted to Supreme Court, Broome County, for an assessment of damages. The question certified is answered in the negative.

Defendant claims that his assent to the terms of the separation agreement of November 14, 1974 was not voluntary but was the result of coercive actions of plaintiff. This original agreement was subsequently modified by instruments dated March 12, 1975 and October 21, 1975, the latter stating that "[a]ll other terms, conditions and covenants contained in the Separation Agreement and the Amendment to the Separation Agreement [dated March 12, 1975] are to remain in full force and effect." Although defendant stated that plaintiff had continued her threats during the period of this second modification, he failed to give details of the alleged coercive conduct and did not tie that conduct to his assent with any degree of specificity. The purely conclusory statements that his assent to said modification was a result of plaintiff's coercive influence are insufficient. While the courts will scrutinize carefully the circumstances surrounding the execution of a separation agreement (Christian v Christian, 42 N.Y.2d 63), defendant has not come forward with an evidentiary showing on this crucial issue such as to warrant denial of a motion for summary judgment (see Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 N.Y.2d 1065; Indig v Finkelstein, 23 N.Y.2d 728).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

McGahee v. Kennedy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 27, 1979
48 N.Y.2d 832 (N.Y. 1979)

finding that a conclusory defense of coercive influence to enforcement of separation agreement was not a bar to summary judgment

Summary of this case from Brengel v. Park Avenue Plaza Company
Case details for

McGahee v. Kennedy

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN V. McGAHEE, Appellant, v. F. KEITH KENNEDY, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 27, 1979

Citations

48 N.Y.2d 832 (N.Y. 1979)
424 N.Y.S.2d 343
400 N.E.2d 285

Citing Cases

Lewis v. Rutkovsky

Plaintiff's deposition testimony was factual, simply reflecting her recollections of how often she visited…

Wittorf v. the City of New York

Conclusory allegations or denials are insufficient to either warrant or defeat summary judgment. McGahee v…