From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClary v. Lawson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 30, 2017
No. 17-6313 (4th Cir. Jun. 30, 2017)

Summary

dismissing deliberate indifference claims against defendant nurses because they "are entitled to rely upon the physicians' orders"

Summary of this case from King v. Henry

Opinion

No. 17-6313

06-30-2017

RONALD MCCLARY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MITCHELL LAWSON, Nurse Supervisor; JOSEPH LIGHTSEY; NURSE HENDERSON; NURSE SIERRA, Defendants - Appellees.

Ronald McClary, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Nathan Douglas Childs, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Charles Houston Foppiano, Gary Adam Moyers, BATTEN LEE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-ct-03147-FL) Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald McClary, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Nathan Douglas Childs, Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Charles Houston Foppiano, Gary Adam Moyers, BATTEN LEE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ronald McClary appeals the district court's order and judgment granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing McClary's civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McClary v. Lawson, No. 5:14-ct-03147-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

McClary v. Lawson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 30, 2017
No. 17-6313 (4th Cir. Jun. 30, 2017)

dismissing deliberate indifference claims against defendant nurses because they "are entitled to rely upon the physicians' orders"

Summary of this case from King v. Henry
Case details for

McClary v. Lawson

Case Details

Full title:RONALD MCCLARY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MITCHELL LAWSON, Nurse…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 30, 2017

Citations

No. 17-6313 (4th Cir. Jun. 30, 2017)

Citing Cases

McClary v. Joyner

McClary v. Hopkins, No. 16-7063 (4th Cir. Nov. 22, 2016) (dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction); In re…

King v. Henry

In her capacity as a registered nurse, Defendant Allen relied upon the judgment of the physicians who were…