From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCarty v. Kansas

U.S.
Jun 10, 1968
392 U.S. 308 (1968)

Summary

In McCarty v. Kansas, 392 U.S. 308, 20 L.Ed.2d 1115, 88 S.Ct. 2065 (1968), the judgment of the Kansas Supreme Court was vacated with respect to the codefendant Boyd and the case was remanded for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, supra.

Summary of this case from State v. Sullivan Sullivan

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.

No. 548, Misc.

Decided June 10, 1968.

199 Kan. 116, 427 P.2d 616; certiorari granted with respect to petitioner Boyd, judgment vacated and remanded; certiorari denied with respect to petitioner McCarty.

Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Richard E. Oxandale, and Daniel D. Metz, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.


The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted with respect to petitioner Boyd. The judgment of the Kansas Supreme Court is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293. The petition for a writ of certiorari with respect to petitioner McCarty is denied.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).


Summaries of

McCarty v. Kansas

U.S.
Jun 10, 1968
392 U.S. 308 (1968)

In McCarty v. Kansas, 392 U.S. 308, 20 L.Ed.2d 1115, 88 S.Ct. 2065 (1968), the judgment of the Kansas Supreme Court was vacated with respect to the codefendant Boyd and the case was remanded for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, supra.

Summary of this case from State v. Sullivan Sullivan
Case details for

McCarty v. Kansas

Case Details

Full title:McCARTY ET AL. v . KANSAS

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 10, 1968

Citations

392 U.S. 308 (1968)

Citing Cases

State v. Sullivan Sullivan

". . . [W]here two or more defendants are jointly tried for the same offense, a declaration made by one may…

State v. Schultz

[289 Kan. 350] Moreover, this court has held that a valid consent to search does not require Miranda…