Matter of Zaikowskiv.Monzon

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second DepartmentNov 28, 2000
277 A.D.2d 459 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
277 A.D.2d 459715 N.Y.S.2d 898

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • Leichter-Kessler v. Kessler

    …ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs. It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper…

  • Gupta v. Kumar

    …Steven Alexander Biolsi, New York, N.Y., for respondent.Anita Gupta, Forest Hills, N.Y., appellant pro…

lock 7 Citing caseskeyboard_arrow_right

Submitted November 3, 2000.

November 28, 2000.

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Trainor J.), entered April 13, 1999, which denied the fathers's objections to an order of the same court (Lynaugh, H.E.), entered February 4, 1999, which, after a hearing, determined that the arrears of child support and medical insurance were $7,714.14 and $4,800, respectively, and directed, inter alia, that judgments be entered against him in those amounts.

Frank A. Monzon, Patchogue, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Lieb and Hayes, Patchogue, N.Y. (E. Anne Hayes of counsel), for respondent.

Before: WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant failed to order and, if necessary, settle a transcript of the hearing. Since the parties did not stipulate to proceeding without the transcript, the appeal must be dismissed (see, Family Ct Act § 1118, CPLR 5525, 5526 22 NYCRR 670.10[a]; see, Svoboda v. Svoboda, 275 A.D.2d 742 [2d Dept., Sept. 18, 2000]; Matter of Robinson v. Fisher, 275 A.D.2d 326 [2d Dept., Aug. 7, 2000]; Matter of Jerome v. Davis, 187 A.D.2d 514; Matter of Baiko v. Baiko, 141 A.D.2d 635). We note that the appellant's motion to be provided with a free transcript of the proceedings was denied by decision and order of this court dated March 2, 2000.


An alternative to Lexis that does not break the bank.

Casetext does more than Lexis for less than $65 per month.