From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Wise v. Michaelis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 9, 1961
12 A.D.2d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Summary

In Wise v. Michaelis (203 N.Y.S.2d 247, affd. 12 A.D.2d 788) cited by defendant, the court held that the practice of hairdressing and cosmetology by the petitioner in her own home in a residential district was an accessory use.

Summary of this case from People v. Staszyn

Opinion

January 9, 1961


In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review a determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, denying petitioner's application for a permit to use a portion of a residence building for the practice of hairdressing and cosmetology, the board appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 31, 1960, annulling its determination and directing it to issue the permit. Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P.J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Wise v. Michaelis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 9, 1961
12 A.D.2d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

In Wise v. Michaelis (203 N.Y.S.2d 247, affd. 12 A.D.2d 788) cited by defendant, the court held that the practice of hairdressing and cosmetology by the petitioner in her own home in a residential district was an accessory use.

Summary of this case from People v. Staszyn
Case details for

Matter of Wise v. Michaelis

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RUTH T. WISE, Respondent, v. WALTER G. MICHAELIS et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 9, 1961

Citations

12 A.D.2d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Citing Cases

People v. Staszyn

That, however, is not this case. In Wise v. Michaelis (203 N.Y.S.2d 247, affd. 12 A.D.2d 788) cited by…

People v. Nicosia

In affirming such denial, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that such a beauty shop conducted in a…