From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of N.Y. City Transit v. State Division

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 1990
160 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Summary

vacating $75,000 compensatory damage award and holding that any award over $5,000 would be excessive

Summary of this case from Luciano v. Olsten Corp.

Opinion

April 16, 1990


Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that the Commissioner's order is modified by deleting from the second numbered subparagraph of the third decretal paragraph the provision that interest shall be computed at the rate of 9% per annum and substituting therefor a provision that interest shall be computed at the rate of 3% per annum; and by deleting from the third numbered subparagraph of the third decretal paragraph the provision awarding compensatory damages in the amount of $75,000; the Commissioner's order is otherwise confirmed, the proceeding is otherwise dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the respondent New York State Division of Human Rights for a recomputation of interest due to the individual respondent upon the back pay award and for a new assessment of compensatory damages which shall not exceed $5,000.

The determination that Mr. Feliciano was subjected to illegal discrimination is supported by substantial evidence. Also, Mr. Feliciano's testimony that the depression which he experienced caused him to suffer a significant weight loss constitutes substantial evidence of a compensable injury (see, Matter of Bayport-Blue Point School Dist. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 131 A.D.2d 849; cf., Matter of Trans World Airlines v. New York Executive Dept., State Div. of Human Rights, 147 A.D.2d 575, 576). However, we find that, under the circumstances of this case, any award to Mr. Feliciano in excess of $5,000 as compensatory damages would be so disproportionate to the injury suffered as to be excessive as a matter of law (see, Robb Tess Rest. Corp. v New York State Liq. Auth., 49 N.Y.2d 874). Also, pursuant to Public Authorities Law § 1212 (6), any interest rate with respect to back pay of more than 3% would be illegal (see, Matter of Coping v. New York City Tr. Auth., 73 A.D.2d 948). Therefore, the matter is remitted to the respondent New York State Division of Human Rights for correction of these errors (see, Matter of Cosmos Forms v. State Div. of Human Rights, 150 A.D.2d 442). Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of N.Y. City Transit v. State Division

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 1990
160 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

vacating $75,000 compensatory damage award and holding that any award over $5,000 would be excessive

Summary of this case from Luciano v. Olsten Corp.
Case details for

Matter of N.Y. City Transit v. State Division

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. STATE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 16, 1990

Citations

160 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Citing Cases

Luciano v. Olsten Corp.

00); Pioneer Group v. State Div. of Human Rights, 174 A.D.2d 1041, 572 N.Y.S.2d 207, 208 (4th Dep't 1991)…

Epter v. New York City Transit

The former is based on § 1212(6) of the New York State Public Authorities Law, the authorizing statute for…